A branch of armed forces having jurisdiction over another is an example of what type of jurisdiction?

The correct choice regarding a branch of armed forces having jurisdiction over another is reciprocal jurisdiction. This term typically describes a situation where two or more legal authorities can exercise jurisdiction over a particular case or issue, often based on an agreement or understanding. In a military context, different branches may have overlapping responsibilities or authority in certain situations, particularly in operations or legal matters where their functions intersect.

Reciprocal jurisdiction allows for collaboration and shared responsibility, ensuring that authority can be effectively applied in joint operations or legal scenarios. This can be crucial in military operations where various branches may need to work together while still maintaining their unique lines of command and jurisdiction. In these cases, reciprocal arrangements facilitate coordination and legal clarity.

The other options reflect different types of jurisdiction that do not apply to the scenario described. Exclusive jurisdiction would imply that only one authority can govern a particular area or matter, while concurrent jurisdiction indicates that two authorities can act simultaneously in the same situation. Proprietary jurisdiction refers more to the control a governing body has over property or land rather than jurisdiction over other forces.